Wednesday, January 8, 2025
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_img

Related Posts

SC turns down attraction versus choice of Delhi Waqf Board supervisor


SC turns down attraction versus choice of Delhi Waqf Board supervisor

The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday declined to investigate an attraction versus the go to of Delhi federal authorities’s Principal Secretary (Home) Ashwani Kumar because the Delhi Waqf Board supervisor on January 10, reported data firm PTI.

A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal requested the petitioner to switch to the Delhi High Court.

The pinnacle courtroom was listening to an attraction submitted by oneZameer Ahmad Jumlana According to PTI, the attraction was to search for directions to restrict and prohibit Kumar from releasing options because the supervisor of the Delhi Waqf Board and to go away the office with immediate affect.

Lieutenant Governor (LG) V Ok Saxena, that accepted Kumar’s go to, likewise supplied the consent to the go to of IAS policeman Azimul Haque as Delhi Waqf Board’s chief government officer on Friday.

The software declared that the regard to Delhi State Waqf Board ran out on August 26, 2023, and ever since no board was comprised, primarily based on PTI.

The attraction competed within the lack of the board, its powers had been taken management of by the LG by designating Kumar allegedly making use of the powers below Section 99 of the Waqf Act, 1995, specified PTI.

“When the tenure of the board has lapsed on August 26, 2023, there is no question of exercise of any power of the state government under Section 99 of the Waqf Act 1995 to take over the board. Thus, the respondent number 1 is an usurper of the power of the Delhi State Waqf Board,” it said.

Kumar was not certified below the Waqf Act of 1995 and capitalized on the truth that the Delhi Waqf Board remained in an unsure abeyance due to the oversight of the contributors, primarily based on the applying.

The Delhi High Court, on May 28, rejected a comparable attraction submitted by one Yasmin Ali and enforced a penalty of Rs 10,000.

The excessive courtroom said the attraction was publicity-oriented and a misuse of the process of regulation because it didn’t present any sort of reliable components for suppressing the go to of the native authorities policeman because the supervisor of the board, reported PTI.

(With inputs from PTI)

Source link



Source link

Popular Articles