SI Paper Leak Case: The concern of paper leak of Rajasthan Police SI Recruitment Exam 2021 has been within the headlines for the final a number of months. Now discussions are occurring about whether or not or to not cancel the recruitment. Meanwhile, the bail plea of 20 accused is being heard within the High Court. Yesterday the case was heard within the courtroom of Justice Ganesh Ram Meena within the High Court. Advocate Anurag Sharma appeared on behalf of SOG. Senior Advocate Vivek Raj Bajwa, Senior Advocate Madhav Mitra, Advocate SS Hora, Deepak Chauhan and different attorneys appeared on behalf of the accused.
Hearing is within the final spherical, resolution can be vital
Now the listening to is within the remaining levels. This resolution is essential. Because until now no accused has been confirmed responsible on this case. If the High Court grants bail, it should shock the investigating company. Besides, the demand for cancellation of recruitment will even be weak.
What occurred within the High Court?
Yesterday the listening to on this case lasted for about 3 hours within the High Court. Most of the dialogue occurred on the diaries, admit playing cards and slips recovered from the accused. In truth, SOG had acknowledged in its cost sheet that the diary, admit card or every other slip recovered from many accused had particulars of cash transactions written on them.
A paper was discovered from one of many accused, Rajeshwari, on which she had written, “10 lakhs to be given to Jagdish Jani, 3 lakhs to be given to Sunil Beniwal, 2 lakhs to be given to Jagdish Jani’s man who taught the paper.”
The accused’s torn admit card additionally debated
While looking out the home of one other accused Premsukhi, SOG discovered a torn admit card. According to the cost sheet of SOG, there was point out of this transaction additionally. “Jagdish Guru’s man was given two lakh rupees before the exam and five lakh rupees after the exam.” Premsukhi had written this on the admit card. Other accused had additionally written such issues of their diary, on some paper or admit card. There was a whole lot of debate on this within the courtroom.
It was said- Why would somebody who can memorize the query paper in a single and a half hours hold writing down cash transactions?
‘Why would anybody hold accounts written on paper?’
The lawyer of the accused stated that why would anybody hold writing on paper like this? According to SOG, a lot of the accused reads 100-200 questions one and a half to 2 hours earlier than the examination and if he can bear in mind them, he may bear in mind the cash transactions. Why would he depart proof in opposition to himself? On this, the courtroom stated that it might be attainable that at the moment that they had no concept that the investigation may go thus far.
Nothing is written on the back and front of the transaction web page
The accused’s lawyer Vedant Sharma stated that in the course of the diary he has recovered, there may be an account of cash transactions on one web page. Nothing has been written both at first or later. Is it attainable that somebody has bought a diary simply to write down down details about a single transaction? Also, how can or not it’s attainable that each one the accused have written down the small print of the transactions.
Handwriting of the accused present in FSL report: SOG
However, SOG’s lawyer stated that it has turn into clear within the FSL report that each one the handwriting is that of the accused. During the talk within the case of Indubala and Bhagwati, who had put dummy candidates of their place, the courtroom stated that the image of this admit card has been edited in such a means that it’s tough to guess whose image it’s.
Why ought to bail not be granted now?
Referring to the previous choices, the lawyer of the accused stated that the investigating company ought to inform what’s the want that the accused shouldn’t be granted bail. Because particulars of cash transactions on the admit card have been discovered from the accused. Whatever was to be recovered from them, the company has completed so. Now how can they tamper with the proof?
If the husband had the paper then how did the spouse fail?
One accused Praveen was accused of fixing questions. Praveen’s lawyer Kanika Burman stated that Praveen’s spouse Renu Godara had additionally given the paper. She failed. If Praveen had acquired the paper then how would his spouse have failed? On this, SOG’s lawyer stated that the connection between Praveen and his spouse was not good. That’s why he didn’t give the paper to his spouse.
Why would a farmer take a mortgage of Rs 30 lakh?
When the listening to on the case of accused Neeraj was occurring, SOG’s lawyer stated that Neeraj’s father had taken a mortgage of Rs 30 lakh from Kisan Credit Card a number of days in the past. After all, why would a farmer take a mortgage of Rs 30 lakh? On this the courtroom stated that it may be taken. Many issues might be completed.
Now what subsequent?
In this case, the courtroom has requested all of the events to offer their remaining submissions in writing, one web page every, by Monday. SOG will even submit the ultimate recent report on this matter to the courtroom on Monday. After this the courtroom will give its verdict on this.
Also learn – SI Paper Leak Case: Big revelation in SOG’s cost sheet, Ramuram Raika’s son and daughter had acquired the paper earlier than RPSC Chairman, now many huge names are underneath the radar.
